• Dr. Moose@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Are they legit charging money for the tech demo game?

    Also did they mention how much the “upgrades” will be?

    Seems like I’m staying on Steam Deck until that thing wears down into a pile of dust huh.

  • caut_R@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    4 hours ago

    I wanna see what the price is and what reviewers think of the screen and I might get one and sell my Switch OLED.

    However, with these game prices I sure as hell am not getting any games, I‘ll play through my backlog games which I‘ll also check whether and which will get updates. It‘d be really nice if the games I have that play at 30 fps would play at 60 and at 1080p native. Maybe I’ll get physical copies of Switch 2 games heavily discounted later on.

  • Leeuk@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    8 hours ago

    For me, its not the console price thats the problem. £395.99 in the UK but if we consider inflation, the switch 1 would be around £360-365 today. An extra £30ish for a bigger screen and more power is not too unreasonable. Plus ending in 95.99 rather than 99.99 suggests Nintendo have tried to trim the headline price down.

    The real problem is the accessories and games. £75 for new pro controller, £50 for new microSD Express (only ones compatible) £50 for webcam and £67-75 for physical games, £59-£67 for digital.

    Ouch.

  • Blackmist@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Guessing there’s a lot of DLSS going into those resolution and framerate specs…

  • CosmicJoker@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Fuck nintendo and those prices.

    7 seas for me.

    $80 lmao and $90 they are insane

    Guess GTA 6 is truly gonna be $100

    • Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      9 hours ago

      At least this game may be worth it if it’s $/h.
      Nintendos game might be <40hours long of pure campaign (excluding open world games like pokemon)

      • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        8 hours ago

        I don’t want that kind of pricing to be encouraging because if we’re paying per hour of campaign then Civ would be $6K and even something like Kingdom Come Deliverance would be $400

        I don’t have that kind of money.

        • Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 hours ago

          You can’t compare open end games like Minecraft and Civ with a mainly story based game like GTA.
          What you do after the campaign is your issue.
          I just say that it’s understandable if you compare it to traditional media.

          I will maybe buy it once it’s on sale.
          No way in hell will I buy it for full price lol.

          And the price creep will come because you and me are a very quiet minority in comparison to the casual games that buy a nee console solely to play the newest GTA or CoD.

          • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            4 hours ago

            That’s why I didn’t pick Minecraft, Civ has a story mode and KCD is all about its story, just like GTA.

            • Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              3 hours ago

              Didnt even know Civ had a story. Only played Civ6 and didnt really bother looking to hard as I just expected a turn based strategy game.

    • samus12345@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 hours ago

      They’re thrusting themselves back into directly competing with Sony and MS with those prices. Bold move in this economy, but they’ll probably do fine. I don’t expect nearly as many Switch 2s sold compared to the original, though.

      • Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Got my sream deck. I am fine without a switch.
        Nothing lost and if I’d need it, emulation works good enough.

        • samus12345@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 hours ago

          I was waiting for confirmation of the price to get a Steam Deck as well. Nintendo was fine as a cheaper side console, but I don’t need 2 $500-ish walled garden consoles.

  • blorps is here@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 hours ago

    The prices plus the fact the “physical” games are just download codes (cartridges are not preloaded) really killed the hype for me. I was excited for the new Mario Kart. But $90 for a physical download code after the lackluster, unfinished feeling main titles (Animal Crossing especially) on the Switch has me kind of disgusted. The game “upgrades” also are a bummer. Mario Party Jamboree, while fun, also feels unfinished. A lot of Nintendo’s newer games do, save for Zelda.

    I just hope Tomodachii 2 is available on Switch 1. If it’s not I’m just going to have to wait for a rip.

  • Vari@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    14 hours ago

    Can’t wait to never buy one. My switch has tears and BOTW on it, and those are the last games I’ll buy from Nintendo so…

  • Squizzy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    17 hours ago

    Given Nintendos never on sale pricing I cannot commit to this console. God 90 for a game is ridiculous.

    Not to mention their awful peripherals pricing and chatoic lineup.

  • Gointhefridge@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    17 hours ago

    That pricing is really putting Nintendo out of its core market. The reason the Switch was an absolute smash is because it was and remained accessibly priced. The fact they’re charging $450 is really putting them out of the “hey that’s not too bad” audience. This is a wildly bad move on their part.

    • carbonari_sandwich@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Yes, it is a price increase, but the inflation has been wild. For context, the Switch in 2017 for $299 is equivalent to $389 in 2025 dollars. It’s really been insane. The Nintendo 64 from 1996 was $199, or $404 in 2025 dollars.

      • samus12345@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Consumers also had more buying power back then, so converting the currency doesn’t tell the whole story.

      • Gointhefridge@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 hours ago

        While you’re not literally wrong adjusting for inflation, their “value proposition” is a bit out the window. It’s so close in price to comparable tech, it seems like a much more serious purchase. Nintendo hit it right with the Wii and the Switch by pricing competitively low. The Switch 2 should follow the same value quotient to be a runaway success. This is effectively what killed the Wii U. The Switch 2 could be destined to follow the same fate.

        Even the mental trickery of “$399” would be more effective than “$449” for Nintendo in the long run. They have to question whether that $50 is worth losing marketshare. I think if they are keeping the game prices and (potentially) the cost of services like online higher than the entry point of buying the system should be lower.

  • Penguinz@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    19 hours ago

    Console price doesn’t bother me so much, but these game prices really instantly killed my hype. Can’t wait to not buy the Wii U 2

  • ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    20 hours ago

    So it’s $650 CAD $700 AUD for the Switch 2 and it’s $120 CAD $150 AUD for Mario Kart.

    LMAO

  • Katana314@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    73
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    120 and 4K are often claimed on console specs but are rarely achieved within games. At best it will be capable of that when playing Netflix or streaming.

    • pory@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Or it’s actually running at 720p30 and being FSR/framegenned into a blurry shimmery mess. There’s no way Nintendo managed to cram a chip powerful enough to render its own Switch 1 games at true 4k120 into a tablet.

        • pory@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 hours ago

          Or it’s actually running at 720p30 and being FSR/framegenned into a blurry shimmery mess. There’s no way Nintendo managed to cram a chip powerful enough to render its own Switch 1 games at true 1080p120 into a tablet.

          Fixed.

    • addie@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      20 hours ago

      The real advantage of a 120 Hz screen is that you get a much more graceful degradation if you dip below your fps target for a bit. If you’re targeting 30 fps but drop to 25, it still feels pretty smooth on a high-refresh screen, whereas that’s appallingly clunky on a low-refresh one. A “poor man’s gsync”, if you will.

      • PalmTreeIsBestTree@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        16 hours ago

        This is what a lot of people don’t understand. Higher refresh rate even with lower fps makes games feel more responsive. I can play 30 fps games much easier on a refresh rate higher than 60hz.

    • simple@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      35
      ·
      24 hours ago

      They announced Metroid Prime 4 will be able to run at 1080p 120fps or 4K 60fps when docked. It doesn’t have the most impressive graphics or anything, but it sounds like they’re actually going to try doing it for a few games.

    • MurrayL@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      24 hours ago

      Yes, for all but the simplest games it will be one or the other, not both at once. That’s how it tends to work even on the flagship XB/PS systems.