• huppakee@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    22
    ·
    9 days ago

    No matter how much I dislike Musk, I don’t think he’s giving that much choice. Erdogan is a dictator who has the power to block X altogether. A real free speech advocate would not succcumb to the pressure of a repressive government, but the article does imply Musk is not the initiator of these bans: “Musk himself said that “the choice is have Twitter throttled in its entirety or limit access to some tweets.” He said X would publicly post the Turkish government’s requests.”

    Not saying we shouldn’t put Tesla’s on fire tho.

    • Dojan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      9 days ago

      Yeah so the solution there is to not just bow down to a dictator. If they want to block Twitter altogether, let them. Let’s not pretend that Musk isn’t willingly going along with that.

    • FauxPseudo @lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      9 days ago

      He only cares about laws when he wants to. He literally controls the internet over their head with Starlink. He could have uncensored Twitter on there and FYIWDWYTM. He isn’t powerless. He is, once again, selectively deciding who gets free speech.

    • everton137@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      9 days ago

      But when it came to following the orders of the Brazilian Supreme Court to provide information about far-right criminals, he defied the country and had X banned for a few weeks on the whole country.

      There is a clear bias when it comes to who X bans, which always favors governments with authoritarian tendencies.