• NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    8 days ago

    Option 1: Tesla fraudulently filed rebates

    Option 2: Tesla filed a backlog of rebates when they realized they had to

    Both are possible, but everyone is jumping to conclusion that it’s option 1, while option 2 is the easier answer.

    Also the government said they’re going to let all the other rebates that this pushed out at the last minute get the rebate regardless of if these were legit or not.

    • Pennomi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      ·
      8 days ago

      Option 2 should be easy to prove, so why didn’t they do that already, like literally the same day they were accused of it? Then their funds wouldn’t have been frozen.

      • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        12
        ·
        edit-2
        8 days ago

        I imagine they probably don’t want to release the information that would prove it if they could, and if they did it’d be redacted enough that no one would believe it anyway. It also costs money to fight endless things like this.

        Ultimately, if the government comes back and says its legit, then people will believe it. If it’s fraud, there should be punishment.

        That whole 1.5 billion accounting fraud story last week, I don’t think Tesla said anything official about it or done anything at least to specifically disprove it, but the FT has now retracted the story saying they made a mistake.

    • alaphic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      8 days ago

      Maybe they shouldn’t have kept a backlog then? That certainly sounds like a ‘them’ problem though, doesn’t it?

      Doesn’t strike me as very efficient either