• Ech@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    111
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 days ago

    “Cure cancer or whatever”

    Fuck all the way off, Altman. You oversell a text generator. You’re not getting a Nobel prize for that.

    • kkj@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      4 days ago

      Kissinger got a Nobel Peace Prize for napalming infants. I wouldn’t put it past them to give Altman one for using more electricity than most countries on glorified autocomplete.

    • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      To be fair, mRNA vaccines are largely possible due to AI, and not just any AI, but similar approaches that LLMs use. They took NLP (natural language processing) concepts, which were the precursor to today’s LLMs, to generate a bunch of possibilities. That’s how we were able to get COVID-19 vaccines so quickly, and we’re likely to use that for a ton of other diseases going forward.

      It’s not that far-fetched that similar techniques could be used to cure cancer.

  • ThePyroPython@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    Sam you can’t “effective altruism” a way of making people not using the general purpose AI tools you designed to “cure cancer” to make silly memes or saucy images.

    If you wanted to cure cancer, you should have made an AI start up focused on curing cancer. But no, you had to buy into that “Rationalism” logic-circle-wankfest and now you’re disappointed when people aren’t making the “correct” timeless-decisions and “optimising for the future” because they’re regular people that spend their free time touching grass and hang around in person and not debating pointless logic thought experiments with strangers on niche Internet forums.