Have you ever heard of the term federation-washing?

  • Darkcoffee@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    it’s not yet federated properly, or would not be completely, but it’s still a good player in the game for now. I’ll advocate against it if shareholders start shenanigans.

    • danc4498@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      I get the mentality, but that’s the problem with enshitification. It always starts good, but once all the twitter traffic moves over, and the world becomes dependent on BlueSky the way it still is for Twitter, what do they become next?

      It would be better to push people away from the closed platform and towards the actual open platform.

      Edit: maybe BlueSky is open source. In such case, if they start fucking around, maybe it would be simple to fork this source code and form your own community. I think until other instances gain tractions, it is hard to consider BlueSky comparable to mastadon.

      https://github.com/bluesky-social/social-app

      • Die4Ever@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        maybe it would be simple to fork this source code and form your own community

        The network effect makes this extremely difficult, even with the source code, it’s basically starting from scratch again.

        • danc4498@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          This would be good. I just hope it can do so while still being a part of BlueSky (as it is today).

      • Darkcoffee@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        The devs also made it clear that if ever bsky became crap, the system is made so that you could just jump over to another instance and go from there.

        So far so good, but yeah I get it, the more they talk about investors, the more I’m reluctant to jump in fully.

        • MysticKetchup@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 day ago

          Except they haven’t actually backed that up with a way for you to jump servers. If the central Bsky server goes down, it takes the network with it. Until they actually let other people host, it’s just meaningless posturing. Without a way for people to leave their network you are as captive there as you are on Twitter

    • Ulrich@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      I’ll advocate against it if shareholders start shenanigans

      I mean, they will. It’s inevitable. So why bother? BlueSky also ultimately retains the final word on moderation as well.