• Hildegarde@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 hours ago

      biden basically did that already. ever noticed there are no byds on the road in the us?

      i seem to recall it wasn’t an outright ban, but unreasonable tariffs on chinese evs specifically. a soft ban, but enough to be as effective.

      • Mihies@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 hours ago

        The official reason for tariffs is government subsidy AFAIK, but in reality the moment they lower the tariffs, US and EU automobile industry is done.

        • Enelop@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          7 hours ago

          The heavy subsidy by the Chinese government is the reason they would dominate though. The tariffs won’t ever be lifted unless they stop manipulating the prices to be lower than domestic competitors…

          • bamboo@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            7 hours ago

            They would dominate because they make a good product that isn’t more expensive than it has to be. US car companies have discontinued most affordable options to try and force people to only buy larger, higher end vehicles that most people have no use for. Now they’re mad that international companies are willing to sell the products they refuse to.

            • Fredthefishlord@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              9
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              7 hours ago

              Yes, usa car companies are bitches. But it is laughable that you think the reason it isn’t more expensive has nothing to do with being subsidized

              • Enelop@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                6 hours ago

                The reason it is vastly less expensive is due to being subsidized. You don’t seem to understand what is being said and can be backed by facts.

                • Fredthefishlord@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  4 hours ago

                  Allowing your local industries to be dominate is common sense. As much as china is smart to subsidize theirs so heavily, the united states isn’t wrong to tariff them

            • Enelop@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              7 hours ago

              And not the 3.2 billion that the government dumped into them…

              I’ve heard they are good cars but the price is manipulated.

              • Hildegarde@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                8
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                5 hours ago

                so… how much did does the us government give its auto industry?

                They gave us auto companies 81 billion between 2008 and 2014, and continue to subsidize the industry to this day.

                pot meet kettle

                • SnortsGarlicPowder@lemmy.zip
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  2 minutes ago

                  BYD recieved 3.7 billion between 2018-2022 2.2 billion in 2022 alone.

                  Ford recieved under 500 million in 2022 but did recieve 1.7 billion in 2023.

                  Ford motor apparently has only recieved 7.7 billion in subsidies since the year 2000. Usually from states rather than fedrally.

          • SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            7 hours ago

            They aren’t manipulating, shits just cheaper to make over there. So they can make more profit and still charge less.

    • Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 hours ago

      That’s the beauty of it. Just get a new one every two years like every other electronic device and you won’t need to worry about that. Subscription plans will be available.

      • GingaNinga@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        8 hours ago

        I wish the batteries were modular/interchangeable. You could just pull into a station, remove the spent battery and replace it with a full one, the spent one can then just get recharged and stored at the station for the next user to change out. You could even bring some extra ones in the trunk for a long trip!

        • Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Yeah, I’ve thought about this too, but real use cases would be rare and maybe somewhere along highways for long trips, but you’d need a lot of stations in hard to predict locations to make it something people could use. Most of the time a simple recharge at night at the domicile would suffice. Add trying to get battery form factors standardized when companies can’t even agree on a universal charger and challenges to upgrading vehicle frames and design if such a standard was ever adopted and it just seems unsustainable.

          • GingaNinga@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 hours ago

            Ya Engineering really is 't my thing but it seams like such a logical way to do things. This would even be great with phones if you could just swap out the battery you’re not currently using.

        • Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 hours ago

          There is a company that does this in China. You lease the battery, and pay roughly the same amount as a tank of fuel to swap it, so not a cheap process, and it only works on a small number of vehicles. They’re also losing money hand over fist, and aren’t likely to last very long.

          Also, a long trip is precisely when I need all my trunk space.

        • catloaf@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 hours ago

          The problem is the form factor. They’re broad, flat batteries under the floor of the car, because that’s the most available space when you take out the drivetrain. If you wanted to make them swappable, you’d have to sacrifice the space under the hood or the trunk. Or the passenger space. And all that comes with their own safety concerns.

          • SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            7 hours ago

            They can drop the battery out from underneath…. You’re not seriously suggesting that this would be done by users and not automatically? The easiest place for this would be exactly where it is now, underneath EVERYTHING.

            It’s not like you are gonna man handle the battery yourself in and out of these dude.

            The precedence is there, there’s scooters that already utilize this exact exchanging. Hell forklifts figured this out decades ago… and you want to make it sound like it would be an issue in todays age? Semis have used it for years too, why do you think they would go back to manually doing it? Even if the batteries were light enough to move by hand, you would spend more time unplugging and plugging them back in than it would be to charge them….

    • Mihies@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Not necessarily as they are using LFP chemistry which has much more cycles than the standard one.

    • Enelop@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      I’m sure it’s similar to how they trained DeepSeek for $5M when it was really over a $1B…

      They make all kinds of false claims.

      • LixWindoz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        I wasn’t aware! Thanks for sharing. Here goes my dream of bootstrapping an LLM model in my parents’ garage.

  • asbestos@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    8 hours ago

    I always think about an “imaginary” scenario where we all have ultra fast charging like this and plug our cars in at the same time. Would the grid experience a brownout?

    • Atom@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      5 hours ago

      I studied this a bit in my MS and the answer is… probably not. “The grid will collapse” has been an anti-technology or pro fossil fuel talking point for a very long time, whether* its arguing against renewables or against personal computers or against AC units. The most recent was solar. Grid operators were adamant that solar would crash the grid if it accounted for more than 10%, then 20%, then 30% and so on and it never happened. Now it’s onto EVs being the grid destroyer.

      The reality is that production and use is not all that hard to predict. Ultrafast charging will eat some power, but that isn’t going to be the norm for wide EV adoption. Public charging will cost more money and be less convenient than charging at home or work over a longer duration. Home chargers are capping around 30-35 amps, generally overnight when grid demand is low. Couple this with the combined low cost for residential solar to change at even lower rates depending on your state/nation’s hostility to solar.

      Now, if every car was replaced with an EV tomorrow, the grid would struggle. But that’s not going to happen. Adoption will be a long slow process and energy producers will increase output on pace as demand forecasts increase. A good parallel to this is Air Conditioning adoption. That’s another high demand appliance that went from rare to common. The grid has its challenges, but now the AC usage is forcastable and rarely challenges the grid.

      Is it a challenge, especially with higher renewable mixtures, yes. Can utilities fumble? Of course. Will it be a widespread brownout every day during commute hours? Not likely.