fossilesque@lemmy.dbzer0.comM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 4 days agoomglemmy.dbzer0.comimagemessage-square16fedilinkarrow-up1325arrow-down111
arrow-up1314arrow-down1imageomglemmy.dbzer0.comfossilesque@lemmy.dbzer0.comM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 4 days agomessage-square16fedilink
minus-squareChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up35·4 days agoWhat if I told you that it works for any number 𝑥 you replace 2 with? (Except for 0 but still working for 𝐥𝐢𝐦 𝑥→0)
minus-squaresp3ctr4l@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up12arrow-down4·4 days ago… where x is positive. Otherwise it has an imaginary component and is complex.
minus-squareSpaceNoodle@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up19arrow-down1·4 days agoNope, it still works even then.
What if I told you that it works for any number 𝑥 you replace 2 with? (Except for 0 but still working for 𝐥𝐢𝐦 𝑥→0)
… where x is positive.
Otherwise it has an imaginary component and is complex.
Nope, it still works even then.
NOW I get it. Thanks.