I already host multiple services via caddy as my reverse proxy. Jellyfin, I am worried about authentication. How do you secure it?

  • CapitalNumbers@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    5 hours ago

    So i’ve been trying to set this up this exact thing for the past few weeks - tried all manner of different Nginx/Tailscale/VPS/Traefik/Wireguard/Authelia combos, but to no avail

    I was lost in the maze

    However, I realised that it was literally as simple as setting up a CloudFlare Tunnel on my particular local network I wanted exposed (in my case, the Docker network that runs the JellyFin container) and then linking that domain/ip:port within CloudFlare’s Zero Trust dashboard

    Cloudflare then proxies all requests to your public domain/route to your locally hosted service, all without exposing your private IP, all without exposing any ports on your router, and everything is encrypted with HTTPS by default

    And you can even set up what looks like pretty robust authentication (2FA, limited to only certain emails, etc) for your tunnel

    Not sure what your use case is, but as mine is shared with only me and my partner, this worked like a charm

    • chriscrutch@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      60 minutes ago

      I’m pretty sure that using Jellyfin over Cloudflare tunnels is against their TOS, just FYI. I’m trying to figure out an alternative myself right now because of that.

      • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        13 hours ago

        web application firewall.

        think of it like an intelligent firewall proxy that can take action against perceived threats like injection attacks or timed attacks. some can also help fight against DDOS when integrated with an actual firewall upstream.

  • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 days ago

    I’ve put it behind WireGuard since only my wife and I use it. Otherwise I’d just use Caddy or other such reverse proxy that does https and then keep Jellyfin and Caddy up to date.

  • Gagootron@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 days ago

    I use good ol’ obscurity. My reverse proxy requires that the correct subdomain is used to access any service that I host and my domain has a wildcard entry. So if you access asdf.example.com you get an error, the same for directly accessing my ip, but going to jellyfin.example.com works. And since i don’t post my valid urls anywhere no web-scraper can find them. This filters out 99% of bots and the rest are handled using authelia and crowdsec

    • Nibodhika@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      21 hours ago

      If you’re using jellyfin as the url, that’s an easily guessable name, however if you use random words not related to what’s being hosted chances are less, e.g. salmon.example.com . Also ideally your server should reply with a 200 to * subdomains so scrappers can’t tell valid from invalid domains. Also also, ideally it also sends some random data on each of those so they don’t look exactly the same. But that’s approaching paranoid levels of security.

    • sludge@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      And since i don’t post my valid urls anywhere no web-scraper can find them

      You would ah… be surprised. My urls aren’t published anywhere and I currently have 4 active decisions and over 300 alerts from crowdsec.

      It’s true none of those threat actors know my valid subdomains, but that doesn’t mean they don’t know I’m there.

      • Gagootron@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Of course i get a bunch of scanners hitting ports 80 and 443. But if they don’t use the correct domain they all end up on an Nginx server hosting a static error page. Not much they can do there

  • skoell13@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    My setup: Locally (all in docker):

    • JF for managing and local access
    • JF with read only mounted volumes that uses the network of my Wireguard client container
    • Wireguard client opening a tunnel to Wireguard server on VPS ** Ping container regularly doing pings to Wireguard Server so the connection stays up (didn’t manage it otherwise)

    VPS (Oracle Cloud free tier, also everything in docker):

    • Caddy as a reverse proxy with https enabled and geolocking (only certain countries are allowed to connect to)
    • fail2ban to block IPs that try to bruteforce credentials
    • Wireguard server

    Usernames are not shown in the frontend and have to be entered. Passwords are generated by a password manager and can’t be changed by the user.

    So my clients just get the URL of my reverse proxy and can access the read only JF through my Wireguard tunnel. Didn’t have to open any ports on my side. If someone is interested I can share the docker compose files later.

    Edit: Here the link to the setup description. Please tell me if something is not clear or you find an error. https://codeberg.org/skjalli/jellyfin-vps-setup

  • Dr. Moose@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    3 days ago

    Tailscale is awesome. Alternatively if you’re more technically inclined you can make your own wireguard tailscale and all you need is to get a static IP for your home network. Wireguard will always be safer than each individual service.

    • irmadlad@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      Love tailscale. The only issue I had with it is making it play nice with my local, daily driver VPN. Got it worked out tho. So, now everything is jippity jippity.

  • Batman@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 days ago

    I am using tailscale but I went a little further to let my family log in with their Gmail( they will not make any account for 1 million dollars)

    Tailscale funneled Jellyfin Keycloak (adminless)

    Private Tailscale Keycloak admin Postgres dB

    I hook up jellyfin to Keycloak (adminless) using the sso plugin. And hook Keycloak up (using the private instance) to use Google as an identity provider with a private app.

    • λλλ@programming.devOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      SSO plugin is good to know about. Does that address any of the issues with security that someone was previously talking about?

      • Batman@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        I’d say it’s nearly as secure as

        basic authentication. If you restrict deletion to admin users and use role (or group) based auth to restrict that jellyfin admin ability to people with strong passwords in keycloak, i think you are good. Still the only risk is people could delete your media if an adminusers gmail is hacked.

        Will say it’s not as secure as restricting access to vpn, you could be brute forced. Frankly it would be preferable to set up rate limiting, but that was a bridge too far for me

        • Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          22 hours ago

          I set mine up with Authelia 2FA and restricted media deletion to one user: The administrator.
          All others arent allowed to delete. Not even me.

  • borax7385@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    I use fail2ban to ban IPs that fall to login and also IPs that perform common scans in the reverse proxy

    • darkknight@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      I was thinking of setting this up recntly after seeing it on Jim’s garage. Do you use it for all your external services or just jellyfin? How does it compare to a fairly robust WAF like bunkerweb?

      • sludge@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        I use it for all of my external services. It’s just wireguard and traefik under the hood. I have no familiarity with bunkerweb, but pangolin integrates with crowdsec. Specifically it comes out of the box with traefik bouncer, but it is relatively straightforward to add the crowdsec firewall bouncer on the host machine which I have found to be adequate for my needs.

    • Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      Or wireguard, depending where & how they want to implement it might be simpler or better/worse on hardware.

  • geography082@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 days ago

    My setup is: Proxmox - restricted LXC running docker which runs jellyfin, tailscale funnel as reverse proxy and certificate provider. So so don’t care about jellyfin security, it can get hacked / broken , its an end road. If so i will delete the LXC and bring it up again using backups. Also i dont think someone will risk or use time to hack a jellyfin server. My strategy is, with webservices that don’t have critical personal data, i have them isolated in instances. I don’t rely on security on anything besides the firewall. And i try not to have services with personal sensitive data, and if i do, on my local lan with the needed protections. If i need access to it outside my local lan, vpn.