• AbsoluteChicagoDog@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        3 days ago

        There’s already plenty of urban sprawl. We need more natural areas. Seize the houses of people who own multiple and make them public housing instead.

        • RowRowRowYourBot@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          Golf courses are not natural areas. They are biological dead zones that are sprayed with pesticides and only hold grasses which do not help pollinators.

          Golf is bad.

          • Soggy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 days ago

            All the ones near me are full of trees, conifers so still not helping pollinators but it is food and shelter for native animals. Golf is not intrinsically bad, the sport can exist without being so classist and environmentally destructive, we just need to accept kinda-janky conditions. Like one my friends live by: it’s right by a tidal flat and quite muddy when the water’s high, the grass is dotted with sand patches, and there’s ducks and geese grazing the lawn or rooting around the marshy edges constantly.

            Environmentalism is important but so are outdoor recreation spaces. We don’t need to live in Lothlorien. (We do need to stop using so many pesticides)

              • Soggy@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 days ago

                It’s not ideal, sure. All man-made structures are bad in that sense, and an 18 hole golf course is far from the most efficient user/area recreation facility. Doesn’t mean it’s an evil and irredeemable pastime.

                • RowRowRowYourBot@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  They are massive ecological dead areas with little to offer anything other than the humans playing golf.

                  Golf is bad for the environment because lawns and the notion of the English Garden are very bad for the environment.

                  • Soggy@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    2 days ago

                    Virtually all outdoor sports are guilty of this but golf is singled out because of the perceived (and sometimes very real) classism association. People aren’t in here calling for the death of elementary school playgrounds or movie theaters or anything else that results in acres of land used for any purpose but native habitat. You know what’s worse than golf courses? Impermeable surfaces. Buildings and parking lots and concrete interrupting the naturally slow seep of water from rainfall to ocean or aquifer, massively accelerating erosion and destroying riparian ecosystems.

                    I’d much rather see a push for native rooftop gardens and better wetland management and a change in city planning that embraces greenbelts and preserves the watershed.