The fusion-fission hybrid will use high-energy neutrons produced by a fusion reaction to trigger fission in surrounding materials thereby boosting energy output and potentially reducing long-lived nuclear waste.

  • milicent_bystandr@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    6 hours ago

    fusion-fission power plant

    Sounds like you’re just undoing your work. Put the pieces together, take them apart again. Energy!

    Wake up babe new perpetual motion dropped!

      • eleitl@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        19 hours ago

        Yes, the uranium tamper in a fusion weapon. Half of the energy in a fusion weapon comes from fast neutron fission, mostly in U-238. It’s not a chain reaction.

  • Singletona082@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    2 days ago

    OK. Here’s the real question.

    Are they sharing that research? I ask because if we can all get our heads out of our asses on energy production that kinda… wipes out a major reason for wars. Oh sure there are lots of OTHER reasons, but getting that off the table of excuses would be nice.

    Also using fission materials as a way to shield the fusion reaction is a damned interesting way of getting around the spalling problem of the fusion reaction destroying its containment walls.

    • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      I’m pretty sure they aren’t doing the design part of the research. A lot of the “new” designs that China has been testing recently, have been sitting on US and European shelves for decades, like since the late '60s and early '70s. There’s just not really a way, in the West, to legally set up a test reactor. China can just ignore things like permits and zoning.

      • cynar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        1 day ago

        This is one of the biggest frustrations with nuclear power. The first power plants had issues (mostly due to them being bomb factory designs). We learnt from that, and designed better ones. They never got built. They were swamped in red tape and delays until they died.

        Decades later, China comes in and just asks nicely. The designs work fine. China now leads the way, built on research we left to rot.

        It’s also worth noting that there is a big difference between a fusion power plant and a fission one. China is doing active research on it, as is the west. There’s quite a friendly rivalry going on. We have also basically cracked fusion now. We just need to scale it up. The only big problem left is the tokamakite issue. The neutron radiation put off by the reaction transmutes the walls. Using radioactive materials as a buffer is an idea I’ve not heard of. I’m curious about the end products. A big selling point of fusion is the lack of long term waste. Putting a fission reaction in there too might lose that benefit.

    • CosmoNova@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      2 days ago

      Well you see. Mega projects in authoritarian countries rarely solve actual problem or serve a purpose. They‘re just there to make good headlines and be forgotten because the next mega project or innovation just made the news!

      • Wobble@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Are we saying things like the three gorges dam, china canals, and rail, are all just for show and don’t serve a purpose?

        • CosmoNova@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          Partially yes absolutely. Some regions with more and more dams have recently experienced devastating floods, suggesting they‘ve tempered with nature a little too much. And yes, some of those new highspeed rails are barely ever used and mainly serve a symbolic purpose, namely connecting outer regions to the central power in Beijing in some way or form. Nearly nobody uses those and the best case scenario for them would be a war so they can transport masses of troops quickly.

      • Balder@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        It’s more accurate to say they might be, but not necessarily. China is very aware of the benefits of keeping ahead technologically.

  • Dzso@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 days ago

    This seems like a good step on the way to developing the technology necessary to build a fission plant in the future.