In the piece — titled “Can You Fool a Self Driving Car?” — Rober found that a Tesla car on Autopilot was fooled by a Wile E. Coyote-style wall painted to look like the road ahead of it, with the electric vehicle plowing right through it instead of stopping.

The footage was damning enough, with slow-motion clips showing the car not only crashing through the styrofoam wall but also a mannequin of a child. The Tesla was also fooled by simulated rain and fog.

  • riodoro1@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    21 hours ago

    I fucking hate tesla and elon musk. Also I fucking hate people calling unverifiable shit science

    • Valmond@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      21 hours ago

      Well, it was published, up to you to do a peer review I guess!

      Also, this isn’t needing science, it blatantly shows that things does infact not function as intended.

      • johnynolegs@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        21 hours ago

        Just fyi, they used AEB in one car and cruise control in another. Far from even. I think it was a fail from the start considering they couldn’t get AEB to even fire on the Tesla driving without cruise control. Insane

      • riodoro1@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        20 hours ago

        Were is a robust description of the experiment? Or am I supposed to look frame by frame at the screen in the car to deduce the testing conditions?

        All he had to do was tell us clearly what is enabled on each car and what his inputs are. That would solve all the tesla fanbois comments about him cheating. Maybe he didn’t for „engagement”.

          • riodoro1@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            20 hours ago

            He made an elaborate test track specifically to make interesting observations.

            He set up dozens of cameras to record interesting observations from multiple angles.

            He collected footage of interesting phenomena he observed as they were happening in his elaborate test environment.

            He then cut the footage up so much it’s impossible for us to say exactly what really happened.

            If he went to all this trouble, and then made claims based on his experiment would it really hurt the video to explain the testing process a little bit more?

    • nyctre@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      21 hours ago

      You’re upset that made up people in your head called this video a research project or something? Because the closest thing I could find to what you’re complaining about is his YouTube channel’s description where it says “friend of science”.

      He never claimed to be a scientist, doesn’t claim to be doing scientific research. In his own words, he’s just doing some tests on his own car. That’s it.