• cylon@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    1 day ago

    Memory is cheap and data sells enough to many parties. Most apps are just store front for Ads and data collection.

    No wonder why open source apps are quite light.

  • buddascrayon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    2 days ago

    Oh, they have new functionality. It’s all in the back end, detailing everything you do and sending it to the parent company so they can monetize your life.

  • the_wiz@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    Deutsch
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 day ago

    Is this the appropriate point to reference the suckless community? I mean, that’s THE point of the movement…

  • UnfortunateShort@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    2 days ago

    Because companies give zero fucks. They will tell you they need tons of IT people, when in reality they want tons of underpaid programmers. They want stuff as fast and cheap as possible. What doesn’t cause immediate trouble is usually good enough. What can be patched up somehow is kept running, even when it only leads you further up the cliff you will fall off eventually.

    Management is sometimes completely clueless. They rather hire twice as many people to keep some poorly developed app running, than to invest in a new, better developed app, that requires less maintenance and provides a better user experience. Zero risk tolerance and zero foresight.

    It still generates money, you keep it running. Any means are fine.

  • AppleTea@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    45
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    isn’t it a combination of younger developers not learning to programme under the restrictions of limited memory and cpu speed, on top of employers demanding code as soon as possible rather than code that is elegant or resource efficient or even slightly planned out

    • herrvogel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      2 days ago

      Mostly the latter. We don’t do any optimizations on our product whatsoever. Most important thing is to say yes to all the customers and add every single feature they want. Every sprint is spent adding and adding and adding to the code as much as we can and as quickly as we can. Not a single second is allotted to any discussion about performance or efficiency. Maybe when something breaks, but otherwise we keep piling on more crap at full speed non-stop. I have repeatedly been told “the fast way is the right way” followed by laughter. I was told to “merge this now” on multiple occasions even when I knew that the code was shit, and told the team as much. I am expected to write code now and think about it later.

      As you can expect, the codebase is a bloated nightmare. Slow as shit, bugs galore, ugly inconsistent UI, ENORMOUS memory use, waaaaaay too frequent DB access with a shit ton of duplicate requests that are each rather inefficient themselves. It is a rather complex piece of lab management software, but not so complex that it should be struggling to run on dedicated servers with 8 gigs of RAM. Yet it does.

    • MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Generally maybe but for apps specifically, it’s the default choice of IDE, Android Studio, bundling tons of libraries for added functionality bound to Play Services.

      Which would probably be illegal in EU now, if any judge had the tech see-through for it.

  • Stovetop@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    217
    ·
    3 days ago

    It’s just that we have to make space for our 5,358 partners and the telemetry data they need.

  • Gxost@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    2 days ago

    It’s all because of Electron, unnecessary libraries, and just bad coders. Asus Armoury Crate weighs a lot and is so slow, but it’s basically a simple app. Total Commander has much more features, but it’s fast, lightweight, and consumes 9 MB of RAM.

  • x4740N@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Lazy devs not removing old non functional commented code and background code additions ?

    Though I do get it if they don’t want to remove the old code if their employer is an asshole

  • Blackmist@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    62
    ·
    3 days ago

    Fucking Chrome/Electron is why.

    I honestly wouldn’t mind that if they could all use the exact same runtime so the apps could be a few MB each, but nooooo.

    • nutt_goblin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      See: Webview2

      Unfortunately, it is extremely painful to work with😔 Enjoy rolling your own script versioning and update systems instead of using squirrel et al

      Edit: I think Tauri works by targeting this and webkitgtk via their wrapper library, unfortunately I can’t get my coworkers to write rust

    • devilish666@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      Is there any alternatives to electron ? And why people’s doesn’t move on to alternatives if electron is huge & heavy resources ?

      • dbx12@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        3 days ago

        The alternative is “just serve it as a regular website”. It doesn’t need to be an app to do its job. Name a functionality which only exists in electron but not in the standard browser API.

  • count_dongulus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    101
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    Cheaper & faster development by leveraging large libraries/frameworks, but inability to automatically drop most unused parts of those libraries/frameworks. You could in theory shrink Electron way down by yoinking out tons of browser features you’re not using, but there’s not much incentive to do it and it’d potentially require a lot of engineering work.

    • zenpocalypse@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      40
      ·
      3 days ago

      Yeah, though the joke is funny, this is the real answer.

      Storage is cheap compared to creating custom libraries.

      • Tanoh@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        3 days ago

        Also the storage is the cost for the user, and google in the case of play store. So the developers have no incentive to reduce the size.

      • UnityDevice@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        Storage is cheap on a PC, it’s not cheap on mobile where it’s fixed and used as a model differentiator. They overcharge you so much. Oh, and they removed SD card slots from nearly all phones.

    • Bytemeister@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      3 days ago

      Yep. Apps are 20x bigger with no new features…that you are using.

      Let’s not forget that the graphics for applications has scaled with display resolution, and people generally demand a smooth modern look for their apps.

  • enemenemu@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    105
    ·
    3 days ago

    Paypal has 500 mb and just shows a number and you can press a button to send a number to their server.

    It’s insane