• 0 Posts
  • 7 Comments
Joined 11 months ago
cake
Cake day: May 22nd, 2024

help-circle
  • airglow@lemmy.worldtoTechnology@lemmy.worldBuy Once Software
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    16 hours ago

    FOSS adware and spyware apps are rare because it’s trivial to fork it and remove the undesirable elements. Users have every incentive to use the ad-free and spyware-free forks, which eventually causes the superior user-friendly forks to overtake the originals. However, proprietary adware and spyware apps cannot be forked in the same way, preventing users from stripping out the ads and tracking. The ability to use, modify, and redistribute “trash software” allows anyone to transform FOSS with undesirable elements into excellent software by removing such elements, whereas proprietary “trash software” remains trashy.



  • airglow@lemmy.worldtoTechnology@lemmy.worldBuy Once Software
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    17 hours ago

    It’s actually 5 people vs. you right now, and anyone can count to confirm it. Calling out the fact that you have produced zero evidence for your wild claims is not “wanting to lie”, it’s just stating what any observer can see.

    You said that your “reasoning is experience”, so let this conversation be an experience that challenges your perception of what others think about FOSS.



  • airglow@lemmy.worldtoTechnology@lemmy.worldBuy Once Software
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    17 hours ago

    When you look at any app store, you’ll find that the many apps that are infested with ads, spyware, malware, and dark patterns are pretty much always proprietary. Conversely, any FOSS application that tries to introduce such garbage would be forked to remove these offending attributes, which makes FOSS much higher-quality than proprietary software in general.

    You are using false equivalence by incorrectly implying that proprietary software is commercial while FOSS is not. Both FOSS and proprietary software can be sold and commercialized with various monetization strategies. For example, you are currently using Lemmy, a FOSS social network whose development is funded by donations. Nobody here believes that Reddit is better on the basis that it is proprietary adware instead of FOSS.

    Free and open source software licenses provide users the right to use, modify, and redistribute the software. Proprietary software does not. That difference makes FOSS inherently better for users than proprietary software.


  • airglow@lemmy.worldtoTechnology@lemmy.worldBuy Once Software
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Proprietary software is also notoriously low-quality and can disappear at any time when the developer loses motivation. Additionally, because the software is closed source, nobody else is able to continue the development of proprietary abandonware. On the other hand, abandoned FOSS projects can be forked and continued, which is something I see often.