Not a troll post. Why is everything shit?

    • gilly3@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      42
      ·
      10 days ago

      Yes. The US used to work to prevent and break up monopolies. This allowed some of the optimistic promises of capitalism to work. There was competition that worked to bring prices down and quality up.

      In the past few decades we’ve witnessed dozens of competing businesses merged to form conglomerates with little more than speed bumps from government to slow them down, presumably to line the pockets of the would be overseers.

      We lost the competition that drove innovation. There’s little need to do anything to gain market share when there’s no real competition. Instead these mega corporations focus on efficiency to bring costs down, because they’re answering to shareholders now instead of consumers.

      The result is supply chains have become fragile. One supply chain disruption results in a total shut down, because redundancies have been eliminated. When you have competition, you must have redundancies to ensure you can remain competitive. No need for that when you have no competitors.

      • umbrella@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        9 days ago

        and lets be clear that the us only did this for a while because the unionists and socialists were damn about to do a revolution.

        then the capitalist world stopped caring about worker well being after the soviet union went kaput, and started slowly dismantling it.

        • Muyal_Hix@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          9 days ago

          If something bad came from the Soviet dissolution (besides the extreme decline of living standards in many of those countries) is that it completely killed any left-wing ideals in the west. Unions, welfare and common good were seen as “defeated” ideas, because capitalism had won. People still haven’t recovered from the “capitalism won” mentality, so anything that comes even close to left wing is immediately shut down

    • jimmy90@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 days ago

      it isn’t

      if you are assuming everything’s shit and looking for justification then i would say it’s probably caused by chakra mis-alignment

  • 200ok@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    75
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 days ago

    People aren’t being held to account for doing or making shitty things

  • VeryVito@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    45
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    10 days ago

    Because too many people wouldn’t vote for anything less than a perfect candidate.

    And too many people wouldn’t vote for anything more than a rapist conman.

    • Bell@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      10 days ago

      Hey hey hey, that’s autocratic megalomaniac rapist conman, can’t leave out his best stuff.

    • TORFdot0@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 days ago

      Everyone knows that racism and hate was invented in 2006 by Mark Zuckerberg.

      Social Media isn’t innately harmful. But it’s been abused by the powerful to control the masses. The same as religion, print, radio, and television before it

  • Hossenfeffer@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    8 days ago

    I think it’s short-termism combined with capitalism.

    Capitalism tells people that success equals money. Short-termism tells people to focus on how much they can grab right now.

    Look at the actions of C-suite level people. They do what they can to increase profits this year to get a massive bonus this year. If that means laying off half the company that’s ok because they’re incentivised to maximise profits now. So they do. The next year they’re off to a different job at a different company and they will get that job because “When I was CEO of Mongoose & Felcher I increased YOY global profit by 270%”. Their focus is never on the actual well-being of the company or its employees or on the social or environmental impact of the company because their bonus isn’t dependent on those things.

    Politicians are much the same. If they’re not in power they want to get into power. If they are in power they have to act as quickly as possible to achieve their aims because they might only be in power for a single term.

    One of my favourite ‘business’ ideas came from Gus Levy who was CEO of Goldman Sachs back in the 1970s. He came up with the term ‘long-term greedy.’ The idea was that you dealt fairly and honestly with your clients, never gouged them, kept your word, and did a good job. Sure, you might make slightly less profit from those clients this year but you would keep them as clients next year too.

    No-one seems to be long-term greedy anymore.

  • snek_boi@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    edit-2
    10 days ago

    Not a troll post.

    Fair enough. I’ll take your question seriously.

    Without any context, it sounds as if everything that you’re perceiving right now is shit. Maybe your relationships are strained and you feel lonely or guilty. Maybe the news hits you harder every day. Maybe money is tight. Maybe you’ve suffered a great loss. Maybe nothing has happened at all and you’re sitting there, contemplating whether life is worth it. I don’t know your situation.

    And whatever it is, it’s valid. Heck, I sometimes feel like life is shit.

    Now, I’m not here to say we should look at reality with rose-colored glasses or to look at reality with naive optimism. No. I’m here to say that we have a choice. We can choose what to focus on and how to respond to reality.

    Is it really true that “everything is shit”? Is the fact that your body has managed, against all odds, to sustain your life shit? Is the fact that humans can grow and change shit? Is the fact that we can be better as people shit?

    Still, shit happens. And we have to be ready to accept that. Regardless of how much shit there is, we can always choose how to respond to it.

    For one, we play a massive role in our interpretation of shit. There’s solid science behind this. You could look at theories of cognition such as the Theory of Constructed Emotion, Relational Frame Theory, or even the shallow but effective Cognitive Behavioral Therapy frameworks. All of those theories think it’s crucial to notice the lens that you and I are looking at the world through. Not only should we notice the lens, but sometimes we should clean it or direct it elsewhere. Otherwise we spend our whole lives stooped over a pile of crap, when we could stand, look around, and notice the world around us from a different perspective.

    But that’s not the only thing that matters. We don’t just want to see the world differently. We also want to live valued lives. Once again, this is possible regardless of how much shit there is. How so? Well, what kind of person do you want to be? A kind person? A person that is reflexive and open minded? A person that notices and appreciates beauty when it appears? A person who is proactive about their future and that of others? A person who is compassionate towards others? A person that’s curious about the world and how to improve it?

    It’s not easy, being kind, appreciative, and proactive when you’re bogged down by shit. But you’re not alone. There’s brilliant and insightful people who have dedicated their lives to finding out how to do it. If you’re interested, I’m happy to talk about empirical ways of doing it. For now, it’s more important to ask what the alternative is. Is a life spent stooping over shit a good life?

  • ZagamTheVile@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    10 days ago

    Money and greed.

    But you can help. Grab a grocery bag, go out side and pick up some trash. Talk to your neighbors. Go put change in parking meters that are about to expire. Go through a parking lot and put shopping parts in the corral. Get a bag of frozen peas and feed some ducks (not bread). Get some cheap paper plates and a marker or two from a dollar store, make happy faces and staple them up on telephone poles.

    The more we act hyper-locally, the better we can make it. Maybe it will inspire othdrs to do the same. But even if they don’t, you’re still making the world a better place.

  • nicerdicer@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    edit-2
    8 days ago

    The root source of things being shit nowadays is capitalism. Capitalism only nows one direction: upwards. Each quarter profits have to exceed the preceding quarter. The result is that products and services get worse over time, because in order to make more profit than the last time, corners have to be cut.

    The new iteration of a product gets more flimsy, because they use cheaper materials, or they alter the design to save on material. Or products have a built-in life span (e.g. batteries that cannot be replaced or limited software updates or intentional software incompatibility).

    When it comes to digital services, features will be stripped over time or the customer has to pay additionally for a feature that was once included. Or they arbitrarily limit the number of devices one can use the service on. They can do it, because most customers are not prone to change a specific online service, beacuse it either is a hassle or existing alternatives do not offer the same content diversity.

    The same goes for operating systems, albeit they are rather not stripped of functions, but new bullshit features that no one asked for get implemented (best example is the implementation of AI features into the operating system (Windows - Copilot or Apple - Apple intelligence) that - in case of both - forces users to even replace their hardware). Tech companies know they can pull shit like this off, because (and this mostly applies to professional users) some users need to run specific niche software on their computers that is programmed for a specific OS exclusively.
    The whole AI craze is just to make money (selling data) off of the user and also forcing them to buy the new thing, because tech companies took care of deliberately designing everything in a way that it is incompatible with older hardware.

    One major problem with this is that, although capitalism is the cause of it all, we all grew up with capitalism and are stuck inside the system up to a point where we profit off of it in certain parts. Having the new shiny thing availiable at any time is the nice part of it. Having to work more for less compensation (because company already builds everything cheaper and now comes for your wages/ salary in order to make profit) is the disadvantage of it. There theoretically is a solution for it: Socialism. Theoretically, because it doesn’t account for the desire of people to gain power over stuff and/ or other people.

      • nicerdicer@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        8 days ago

        First of all - don’t overthink it! There are so many factors that play into this whole ordeal that a single person can’t change. As other posters have said: Not all is bad. Always keep in mind that on the internet, these things seem to be much more dire than they are.

        When it comes to the things I described in my post: Try to buy consciously. Assess if you really need the thing (example: If you alredy own a laptop and a smartphone - is there really a need for a tablet?). Try to buy things that last longer. Most products come in basically three price ranges: cheap, mid-price, overly priced. On most occasions it is sufficient to go with the mid-price range. This mostly offers the best price-performance-ratio. If you buy cheap you buy twice in the end (first for the cheap thing, then for the more expensive version that you should have bought to begin with). If you buy overly priced you probably are wasting money for a thing that could have been cheaper in the first place.

        If you are not satisfied with digital services, then leave them for an alternative. For instance, I was unsatisfied with my bank. They tried to pull something off, thinking I will put up with it. I did some research and now I have changed my bank, even with better conditions than before. It was easier than I thought. The same goes with email providers or phone providers. If they enshittify their service for you, go to their competitor. Nowadays you can port your phone number with you. Companies are accounting for their users’ laziness. That is why they can pull shit off in the first place.

        When it comes to computers and operating systems, there is something you can do already: Go through all your settings and switch off all things you don’t need (e.g. telemetry data, uninstall programs you do not use). If you don’t know what a specific setting does or if it is needed, just look it up on the internet. Chances are great that at least one other person on this planet has the same question (that has been answered hopefully).
        If your computer reaches its end-of-life, because the upcoming operating system is not compatible any longer, try to look out for an alternative. With a Linux-bases operating system, your old hardware might get some extra years to come. I think these have come a long way. 25 years ago I experienced myself with Linux, and it was awful! That might have changed now, and especially here on Lemmy there are many resources and users happy to help.

        Try to use alternative programs, perferrably free- and open source. Or, alternatively, look out for programs that you can buy once and that do not operate as a subscription service. If you own a program legally (by having it bought once), it can’t be taken away from you. When you subscribe to a program, companies always can take features away or make you pay more for them. This also applies for media as well.

        With these things taken into consideration, you will feel less powerless and a bit more in control of things. And it probably will save you money in the long run.

    • basketugly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 days ago

      It apparently is human nature to select leaders who are susceptible to corruption and incentivized to propagate the corrupt systems. I believe we need a solution where we have full traceability and hold leaders accountable, I have never seen anything close to this in my lifetime. Perhaps it is because we have collectively left the wolves to guard the henhouse? Replace the wolves with dogs who are aligned with human best interests.

  • bunkyprewster@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    10 days ago

    Because of the collapse of the USSR. It was the only thing scaring capitalists into giving something to the people.

      • Stovetop@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        9 days ago

        Same thoughts here.

        Without fear of opposition becoming dominant, the ruling powers that be are not incentivised to placate the masses, and instead consolidate power and turn to self-enrichment. Similar to what is seen in autocratic or single-party states, eventually leading to some sort of collapse or revolution when the people reach a breaking point.

        Capitalists currently control the world, and they’re not going to cede any of that control voluntarily unless they have something to be afraid of.