• 3DMVR@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    7 days ago

    I would never feel bad about that, have you ever had girls show you their gcs? I’m traumatized

    • 3DMVR@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      Think woman project a bit about what men do, since ive never discussed womans bodies in a homie gc or seen ppl do it, sure some out there exist and its not rare but all the girls I know discuss everythink, like dick shape size, how long they last what kinks they have everything you thought was private

  • AidsKitty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    7 days ago

    Be careful who you trust and only post things online that you wouldn’t mind everyone in your life seeing. Never trust the internet.

  • rumba@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    7 days ago

    LOL private chat with 8 people.

    You don’t even need a Derek, all you have to do is have one of the 8 perceive that they are being wronged. One’s mate makes googly eyes at another, next thing you know, it’s all public.

    Never post anything anywhere if it ever getting out will fuck you.

    Nothing is private and you should strive to be the kind of person that doesn’t say shit about other people behind their backs.

  • Letsdothisok@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    7 days ago

    Wow. Derrick is a dirty pu–y. Screw you, Derrick, you don’t even know us. This is why no one likes you, Derrick.

  • Ledivin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    170
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    9 days ago

    If the contents of my friends’ group chat got leaked… people would just think we’re fucking idiots, not terrible people.

    Good work, Derek. Be better, losers in that chat.

    • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 days ago

      derek is still a cunt though. If you join and find shit you don’t like the first thing you should do is confront people. Either derek just likes causing people problems (and is a problematic individual) or he is not very bright and thinks that everything people say must be 100% true and serious.

      I would not ever want to be friends with derek, that’s for sure.

    • TriflingToad@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      67
      ·
      edit-2
      8 days ago

      I think my saved memes are 50/50 funny and concerning

      The thing is, on Lemmy these are pretty normal… but for my very conservative grandma who hardly understands what a lesbian is…

  • son_named_bort@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    49
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 days ago

    I once had a group chat that got leaked. There’s a possibility that it may have involved some light treason.

  • MTK@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    52
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    8 days ago

    Ah yes, “cocksucker” as the first insult to come to mind, the sign of a good person

      • MTK@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 days ago

        It implies that for a man, sucking cock (a legitimate sexual act for any gender) is an insult because that would make him gay. So Homophobic.

          • MTK@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 days ago

            He could have also said “vaginalicker” but he didn’t, he used a well known homophobic slur. Also, if he wanted to say submissive he could have used well known submissive insults.

          • abbotsbury@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            8 days ago

            That’s still degrading to fellators.

            And idk if I’d say it’s a power thing, cocksuckers are the active participant in a blow job, and I’d say the submissive one is the one with their meat between a pair of teeth.

            • BigBananaDealer@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              8 days ago

              its still at the end of the day giving pleasure to another. giving the key word: power thing. its the same atmosphere as bootlicker

              • Redfox8@mander.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                8 days ago

                So, if you were to replace ‘cocksucker’ with ‘towelhead’, slut, Yid, or Nig*** would that still just be a power thing?

                Not that it actually makes a difference. This ‘power thing’ you refer to is controlling abuse for self interest. Introducing a predudice is just a way of trying to justify and/or hide the abuse.

              • abbotsbury@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                7 days ago

                Okay but like, in regular penis-in-vagina sex, the man is (theoretically) giving pleasure to the woman while also doing all the work. Is that still power play? Is pussyfucker the same as cocksucker?

                • BigBananaDealer@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  7 days ago

                  pussyfucker isnt an insult ive ever heard but motherfucker is

                  cocksucker reminds me of the prison mentality of making someone your bitch so thats where im getting the power play from

                • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  4
                  ·
                  7 days ago

                  i mean yeah, pussyfucker if you used as an insult would be quite a weird insult to throw, but it would work i suppose.

                  Motherfucker is also in the same vein like the other commenter suggested.

              • MTK@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                8 days ago

                Being submissive in sex can be expressed in a blowjob, but so can being dominant. Most sexual acts can be either dominant or submissive under the right context. For example a person can forcibly (consensually) throw the other person down, pin them to the floor and start going down on them while not letting them orgasm. Is the person being overpowered and forced to be frustrate by not orgasming the one in power?

                Your understanding of mutual respect and love is unhealthy if you compare going down on someone to bootlicking.

                • BigBananaDealer@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  8 days ago

                  im comparing an insult to bootlicking. jesus christ you people really feel like arguing over absolutely nothing

            • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              7 days ago

              find me people who suck cock that actually give a fuck about other people calling people cocksuckers and we can talk.

              And idk if I’d say it’s a power thing, cocksuckers are the active participant in a blow job, and I’d say the submissive one is the one with their meat between a pair of teeth.

              nobody is arguing that sucking cock is submissive??? The argument is that being a cocksucker is a submissive thing.

              Or you trolling? Or are you actually serious?

        • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          7 days ago

          ok?

          So what if i just argued that “cocksucker” just meant that you would suck someones cock if you got you something. I.E. you’re easily bribed/manipulated. As far as i know, that’s how most people use it.

          That’s literally the implication like 99% of the time. If you wanted to insult someone for being gay, you would just call them a faggot or something lmao. No need to mince words at that point.

            • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              6 days ago

              to be clear, the wiki page you explicitly linked literally say it has a historical connotation, and the primary example it lists is from checks notes 53 years ago.

              I’m going to hazard a guess that the sentiment has probably changed, a little bit. Since 1972. 1972 to be clear, was 8 years after the passing of the civil rights act. It’s a bit of a different time period now.

              anyway point is, i’m not convinced anybody cares about using this as a homophobic slur anymore.

              Sorry for the short temper, this thread has been too long and I already explained this on another comment.

              it’s whatever, that’s how the internet is lol. This thread has been more than amusing for me thus far.

    • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      14
      ·
      8 days ago

      Is the person who made the comments a narcissist, yes. Is the person who screen shorted it and shared it also a narcissist, absolutely.

      • someguy3@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 days ago

        “Hmmm should I expose all the offensive photoshops and derogatory things they did said about specific people?” No that’s not narcissist by itself.

        • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          11
          ·
          edit-2
          8 days ago

          They hurt everyone else involved intentionally do to a sense of self richeousness. It’s a textbook definition of narcicism.

          If someone calls the person they are going through a breakup with a self richeous dingbat who likes to tear down everyone around them in a private chat it’s not a nice thing to do. It also didn’t hurt that person until Derek brought it to their attention in an attempt to hurt the speaker while upsetting/hurting the person who was called names. Especially digging up things from years ago. These people aren’t running for office, they are kids dealing with life in a place of privacy. The number of people I’ve heard call soneone a little dicked asshole who isn’t good in bed is around 50. Never once would I think spreading that information to them or their friends group would be for the greater good. The person is hurt and lashing out. It’s often best to let them recover and sort out their own situation. If they were making plans to harm someone that’s another story, but that isn’t what happened here it appears.

          • someguy3@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            14
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            8 days ago

            At the point of sharing photos and Photoshopping someone to ridicule them, this isn’t an offhand comment said in frustration. This is planned and executed ridicule and mockery. He’s exposing them because he thought their “friends” should know who they are and what they are doing. Not for the intent of “hurting everyone else involved intentionally due to a sense of self righteousness”. Whether you agree with what he thought or not, it’s not narcissism (by itself).

            It’s also super bizarre that you want privacy for them when they are fucking sharing photos (the context reading they were private) and sharing “raunchy texts”. Where was the privacy for their victims huh? They deserve what they got.

            • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              8 days ago

              At the point of sharing photos and Photoshopping someone to ridicule them, this isn’t an offhand comment said in frustration. This is planned and executed ridicule and mockery.

              i mean, we also don’t know what they are. It could be really bad, but it could also be harmless shitposting among the community.

              • someguy3@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                8 days ago

                You can look at the descriptors they chose to use, and that’s very likely playing it down big time. I’m betting it was extremely bad.

                • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  arrow-down
                  4
                  ·
                  8 days ago

                  yeah, but we also don’t know what they are posting, so it’s equally shitty to assume that what they are posting is substantially bad.

                  Though assuming by the fallout, it seems like it was pretty bad? But then again i’ve seen friend groups break up over smaller shit.

          • SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            edit-2
            8 days ago

            I don’t know about you, but I am very reluctant to insult others, even in private conversations, even if they might deserve it

            I always try to approach things constructively, because in the end, those patterns and thoughts bleed out into the world and your behaviour

            And do keep in mind, even from the poster’s side of the story, it sounds pretty darn bad, and people have a tendency to downplay their side’s wrongdoings and elevate the other side’s. Chances are, it was probably quite bad

            If there’s people in my life that go around talking badly about other like that, even in private… yeah, I’d want to stay the hell away from them too. It’s just a massive warming sign, and you’re going to be the target sooner or later. And you don’t want a coordinated group acting in bad faith against you