Almost all business applications have horizontal menus and ribbons that take up a decent percentage of a landscape monitor instead of utilising the “spare” screen space on the left or right, and a taskbar usually sits at the bottom or top of the screen eating up even more space (yes I know this can be changed but it’s not the default).

Documents are traditionally printed/read in portrait which is reflected on digital documents.

Programmers often rotate their screens to be portrait in order to see more of the code.

Most web pages rarely seem to make use of horizontal real estate, and scrolling is almost universally vertical. Even phones are utilised in portrait for the vast majority of time, and many web pages are designed for mobile first.

Beyond media consumption and production, it feels like the most commonly used workplace productivity apps are less useful in landscape mode. So why aren’t more office-based computer screens giant squares instead of horizontal rectangles?

  • Quicky@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Can’t imagine there are too many traditional offices with 40" 6k screens.

    As I say, I think it’s unfair to blame users for “not using the screen properly” when most office software is set up for portrait, while the screens are horizontal. Yes you can use multiple windows (assuming your widescreen display is big enough to allow productive working with two smaller windows), or multiple screens, or rotate them etc, but they feel like workarounds to get around the fact that the applications work naturally in portrait, and most laptop screens for example don’t easily accommodate any of those options. Which is probably why you see more 3:2 laptop displays than standalone monitors.

    • carl_dungeon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      You took me a little bit too literally- I was illustrating a point. People have comparably giant displays compared to the 90’s and yet still treat them as single small displays.

    • SchwertImStein@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      It’s absolutely fair to blame the users in this situation. Hit the fucking win + left/right arrow and you can have 2 windows per screen without any additional tweaks. You can also drag them by hand until they hit the border if that’s to your liking.

      • Quicky@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        As mentioned, this doesn’t solve the problem of apps not utilising the available space efficiently. “Just open another app” isn’t a solution to “Why doesn’t the app I’m working on appropriately use the available space”.

      • bob_lemon@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        Of you press up/down right after left/right the window will be a quarter of the screen instead of half.

        On Windows 11, you can also just drag towards the top, and it’ll give you different snapping options.