• iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      68
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      2 days ago

      As I understand it, that’s still not very historically accurate. It was not really a thing for archers to nock and loose together like they do in the movies.

      • kerrigan778@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Volley_fire Y’all really just make stuff up without even checking wikipedia huh? It wasn’t typically used in medieval Europe for bows beyond the initial volley, though of course initial volleys were still a thing. You didn’t just have elements of archer formations fire whenever they decided the range seemed right.

        • CommanderCloon@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          You’re misunderstanding. War bows can’t be held, the bow is way too heavy to allow you to hold an arrow and loose it at will; drawing and loosing are two actions of a singular movement.

          Volleys were used, but the similarity with the way they’re used with firearms only exists in the use of crossbows, which were invented specifically because they allow to draw and shoot in two motions (and also they require virtually no training compared to war bows)

        • iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          2 days ago

          I made this comment in passing and prefaced with “as I understand it.” Always happy to be corrected.