• collapse_already@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    2 days ago

    And the quality of the AI output sucks. I was recently looking for information about positive convention for yaw, pitch, and roll in aircraft. I was looking at az and yaw and got reasonable results from the AI, but when I looked at pitch and el all of the results were about elevator pitches. Even when I spelled out elevation it insisted on elevator pitches. I scroll past the AI results as a matter of principle, but I usually look at them so I have something specific to complain about when people ask why I am so virulently anti-AI.

    • GnuLinuxDude@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      2 days ago

      The other day I tried to have it help me with a programming task on a personal project. I am an experienced programmer, but I only “get by” in Python (typically just by looking up the documentation for the standard library). I thought, “OK. This is it. I will ask Llama 3.3 and GPT4 for help.”

      That shit literally set me back a weekend. It gave me such bad approaches and answers, that I could tell were bad (aforementioned experience in programming, degree in comp sci, etc) that I got confused about writing Python. Had I just done what I usually do, which is to look up the documentation and use my brain, I would have gotten my weekend task done a whole weekend sooner.

      It scares me to think what people are doing to themselves by relying on this, especially if they’re novices.

    • bassomitron@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 days ago

      AI is useful for basic, mundane tasks and that’s about it. Trying to force it to be some sort of Uber search engine is such a bad idea.

    • reiterationstation@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Yea that’s a bad example of what to use ai for at least right now. You’re going to get bad results with that question.

      It’s good for things, if you pay.

      • collapse_already@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        2 days ago

        I don’t want to ask ai. Google automatically gives me ai search results that are piss poor. Those useless results still use energy to generate.

        • andros_rex@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          22 hours ago

          Google automatically gives me ai search results that are piss poor.

          And these results are taken at face value by a shocking number of people. I’ve gotten into niche academic arguments where someone just copy and pasted the AIs completed hallucinated response as “evidence.”

          I experimented with using AI to generate basic quizzes for students on concepts like atomic theory or conservation of energy, but maybe 2/20 questions it came up with were any form of accurate/useful. Even when it’s not making shit up entirely, the information is so shallow as to be useless.