• Reygle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    54
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    8 days ago

    I think it’s incredibly important that people know, with absolute certainty, whether or not the new Mozilla/Firefox privacy policy in any way applies to / covers such a service.

    I’m not saying I know the answer- What I’m saying without a concrete, permanently applied answer it’s not even considerable.

    • Rachel@lemmy.blahaj.zoneOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      8 days ago

      There is no email service that exists without a terms of use and privacy policy. I still feel everyone overreacted about Firefox. It’s funnier how many people said they switched to Brave because of it and all the super shady stuff Brave has done.

      • Reygle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        13
        ·
        8 days ago

        Firefox/Mozilla operated without any of the new additions for nearly the entire history of the internet until this year. If anything, “over”-reacting to the new policies was too weak a reaction. You do you and all, but I’ll agree to very strongly disagree.

  • Leraje@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 days ago

    Thunderbird Pro will apparently be:

    This email thing plus Thunderbird Send (which is basically https://send.vis.ee/), Thunderbird Appointment - a scheduling tool and Thunderbird Assist, which is:

    “…at least for now, being cautiously labeled as “an experiment” that will allow users to take advantage of AI features within their email. However, the goal is to be lightweight enough that the language models can be run locally on a user’s PC in the interest of privacy. This service is being developed in partnership with Flower AI, which leverages Nvidia’s confidential compute to provide private remote processing in the event a user’s PC isn’t powerful enough. Sipes emphasizes that any remote processing features attached to Thunderbird Assist will always be optional, in the interest of ensuring complete user privacy.”

    So AI shit that nobody asked for or wants.

    • Lka1988@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      8 days ago

      "[…] This service is being developed in partnership with Flower AI, which leverages Nvidia’s confidential compute to provide private remote processing in the event a user’s PC isn’t powerful enough. Sipes emphasizes that any remote processing features attached to Thunderbird Assist will always be optional, in the interest of ensuring complete user privacy.”

      That’s a lot of words to say “we made an AI that totally won’t suck up your data, trust me bro”

  • Tea@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    8 days ago

    Out of all the articles and the official release announcement, you could share, you shared forbes which violate people privacy.

    Why?

  • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    7 days ago

    welp I signed up for the waitlist.

    I’ll use it for a disposable email at first, and if it endures and does well I’ll move my main shit off to it.

  • werefreeatlast@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 days ago

    Here’s what I want… I leave a computer on at home and it checks my email. I get emails from it at my phone. No setup. Make it work like Sinkthing used to work. I don’t want cloud anything. Fucking backup nightmare where my shit ends up kidnapped by a company for monthly ransom.

  • magic_smoke@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    8 days ago

    I hope to god one day the developers at Mozilla finally get tired of this shit and fork everything under a new org.

    Fuck off with more services and give me my integrated FTP client back. No one who uses Mozilla software wants more cloud shit or online services from Mozilla.

    • mke@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      8 days ago

      No one who uses Mozilla software wants more cloud shit or online services from Mozilla.

      I don’t think that’s unanimous. I’d like to use Firefox Relay, myself, and I’m willing to give thundermail a chance.

      Used to think I’d go full Proton eventually, but leaning more towards a diverse set of service providers, nowadays. It’s also my hope that these services allow Mozilla to depend less on companies like Google, and more on the users they ought to serve, which would be healthier for the org and better for users.

  • KingDingbat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    8 days ago

    I have a 20ish year old history in my Gmail account organized in labels and all that. I wonder if it will be viable to migrate?

    • TheEntity@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      8 days ago

      Considering labels are very non-standard, which caused trouble over IMAP since forever, I wouldn’t count on that part.

    • dustyData@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 days ago

      Please archive shit. It’s OK to save old data, but not on the service. There are ways. Even banks, the most obsessive and legally strapped data hoarders keep their 5+ year old data in deep cold storage, away from the active services. 99.9^% of information that old won’t be looked at by anyone.

      • Brkdncr@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 days ago

        Not true.

        It’s much easier to keep old data in active storage where it can be classified, searched, and have retention/deletion policies applied. Moving it elsewhere makes it more likely you’ll just hang onto it forever while not using it at all.

        • dustyData@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          8 days ago

          When was the last time you had to find a 20 year old email? Share your anecdotes.

          Edit: I’m not being snarky, there are legitimate and more functional solutions.

          • Brkdncr@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            8 days ago

            I don’t disagree that you should set up retention policies to delete old email, I disagree that you should remove old emails from primary service/storage.

            I actually did need a 15 year old email a few months ago. I don’t recall what I needed, but I then set up a retention policy to delete old stuff.

          • Lemming6969@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            8 days ago

            Warranty… Some are 15-20 years, but you need proof of purchase docs, which are often emailed data.

            • dustyData@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              7 days ago

              Why not having an archive of exclusively warranties? Emails can be downloaded, indexed and compressed. I agree on keeping archives of old stuff. But emails used as cloud drives are a huge problem for IT and security reasons. A legal folder is better and facilitates backup, encryption and much more accessibility.

              • Lemming6969@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                8 days ago

                So you don’t really want to archive in the technical sense, you want it offline for security, which is valid but extremely inconvenient for regular end users.

  • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 days ago

    Doesn’t like 90% of Mozilla’s funding come from Google? At least expanding their paid services could be seen as trying to turn that around.

  • Geetnerd@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 days ago

    I’m listening…

    But how is a small non-profit going to afford a free email service? Ads in every email?

    • Rachel@lemmy.blahaj.zoneOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 days ago

      Based on what I’ve seen in their forums it will be a paid service. I think it will be free at first for beta testers but I assume they are targeting people who currently use services like Proton.

  • commander@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    7 days ago

    I’d consider it. If they host things outside of the US/start moving operations overseas, it’d be a lot more interesting. I sub to Proton for email, VPN, and drive support. Still hoping someday for proper Linux drive support so Mozilla/Thunderbird can target that

  • Sam_Bass@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    Sounded great until the “assist” ai feature. I friggin hate Gemini in gmail so any other kind of ai is an automatic nogo for me