• cotlovan@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    17 minutes ago

    As i signed up for this sub, I thought I’d be reading about technology. Actually, it seems that people here are more concerned about companies not sticking to the far left ideology, so naturally they call everyone nazis and fascists, without ever knowing what those words even mean.

    Just because someone doesn’t want to play the gender tip toe dance, doesn’t mean they’re nazis. But I guess that’s not something that this sub is ready to face.

    • Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      5 minutes ago

      I’m with you on the “they’re not Nazi thing”

      I think a Lemmy is being a version targeted radicalization for certain groups.

      But still I think you’re wrong that we can separate technology from this political stuff right now. It’s not separate. Technology is the medium that groups are using to spread this stuff. It’s important and interesting to see how they’re doing it.

      Content should focus on the tech side of it. And also why be angry at the side that’s just trying to protect their freedoms here. If it wasn’t for the people trying to limit their freedoms, we’d never hear of this stuff.

      The issue isn’t people trying to identify as another gender. It’s the people saying no they can’t and then abusing their power and influence to do it.

      • Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        58 seconds ago

        Was yours? Commenting online isn’t exactly fighting the good fight. Did you do anything to help shore up and defend anything.

    • Sizing2673@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      2 hours ago

      This is what’s fucking shitty about this

      Every company and every politician and every person who bends over so willingly IS THE PROBLEM

      It’s like they announce their regime and these idiots roll out the red carpets immediately ready be the first company to suck the government off

      If they all stood their ground, it would buy more time

    • samus12345@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      ·
      3 hours ago

      It’s too hard to change anything, but only if it’s progressive policies. Fascist policies can be implemented immediately.

      • TheEntity@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 hour ago

        It’s too hard to change anything if one believes in laws, rules and the general idea of a fair justice. They don’t have this limitation.

        • AnjunaSouls@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          59 minutes ago

          Yeah, and the platform is set up in a way that hinders onboarding and discoverability of what’s there (at least, compared to youtube’s approach…). These are all problems that prevent it from replacing YouTube. If you read Peertube’s official site they even say upfront that they’re not trying to be a YouTube replacement

      • nibble4bits@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        33 minutes ago

        It’s always a question of money. It costs money to make quality content. YouTube has content because they share ad revenue to their content providers. That expands the more popular the content is because there are more ads displayed. That revenue lets the creators expand their capabilities with better gear and stage sets. Federated networks usually depend initially on volunteers and alternative ways of earning revenue for those instances besides ads.

    • ameancow@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Welcome to how the world has always worked and always will. There’s gin to help wash the black pill down.

  • Fat Tony@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Probably because no one is actually using any gender identity based bigotry any more. So they might as well just remove it, it saves space. /s

  • mindaika@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    2 hours ago

    What about this idea:

    Stop staring at internet videos all day and go get a life. Learn Spanish, take up woodworking, volunteer at your local school, walk around the block… do something useful instead of staring at Internet videos, or worse, making internet videos for people to stare at

    • Ada@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 minutes ago

      Hey. I’m learning Spanish, I’m a volunteer, and I run and cycle on the regular!

      Somehow, that doesn’t stop you sounding like a bigot though…

    • Soleos@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 hour ago

      This is an unhelpful and condescending comment. It dismisses the meaningful activities people engage in online as “not life”: self expression, creating art and community, working, socializing, enjoying entertainment, and learning new things. It proposes a false dichotomy wherein not-online is utopic with universally accessible activities and, especially, an absence of the very same people who make online spaces toxic hellholes. They are present in “real spaces” too. These are not mutually exclusive things. You are likely to find that pro-social activists online are often try to be pro-social activists in person as well.

      That being said, I agree that people get terminally online and that balancing digital and physical lives are important. Managing attention and mental health are important, especially when content about important and meaningful topics turn into viral and incessant feeds that are geared to overwhelm human brains that weren’t evolved to handle such constant cognitive/emotional stress.

      Take care out there folks.

  • mooncake@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    5 hours ago

    It’s time to boycott Google as well now hu? Already ditched their search engine and moved to kagi

    • ameancow@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      15
      ·
      edit-2
      4 hours ago

      Boycotts are performative stunts that feel good but don’t have impact on companies and even gets more attention ON those companies.

      No really, this is a phenomenon that’s known. When people were protesting Blizzard, I swear to fucking god, people I knew for years who hadn’t played WoW since they were kids suddenly decided to reactivate their accounts because all the talk about blizzard “made them nostalgic” and despite being sympathetic to the people hurt by the company, they simply didn’t have the mental value-system to draw lines between those two things. Their own desires to escape and recapture youth was far, far stronger than the social messaging they honestly just felt was finger-wagging and parental scolding, so they rejected the idea of protesting without conscious thought.

      And there are far, FAR more people like this than there are people with steadfast principles and discipline to stick to them. The depressing majority of people are not really thinking, they’re just going with the flow, agreeing with popular sentiment when it’s convenient, doing whatever they want when nobody is looking because capitalism has bled our axioms out.

      If we put that much energy into volunteering with groups raising funds for primaries, getting to know our neighbors and forming communities, actually talking to people in our communities, we would abolish this fascist empire in a single election cycle. (Assuming we have elections again.)

  • AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    10 hours ago

    While I hate Google, this seems like one of those much ados over nothing. They specifically mention ‘sex, gender, or sexual orientation’, which to most reasonable people would cover gender identity.

    • patatahooligan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      “Gender” means nothing without context. By a MAGAs definition of gender this policy doesn’t protect trans people, for example. We don’t know how this rule will be interpreted in practice. Even if you don’t consider the intent behind making this change, this is objectively a weaker guarantee of protection than what we had with “gender identity and expression”.

      • AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        5 hours ago

        This is not a legal contract, it’s a general guideline for users about what is or isn’t acceptable. The intent and spirit of the terms are clear, the only question is whether Google will enforce them not. If the enforcement is crappy, like what Facebook is famous for, it doesn’t matter a damn what exact terminology they use in the guidelines.

  • fxdave@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    12 hours ago

    I’m not in favor of YouTube, but what exactly missing here?

    • Chocobofangirl@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      5 hours ago

      It used to say gender expression and identity. If it doesn’t, that’s a deliberate decision that could cause enforcement calls like ‘well that’s not your REAL gender so this isn’t harassment’.

      • fxdave@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 hours ago

        I mean… It’s already over-specified compared to others: “sex, gender or sexual orientation”. It’d be equally right to criticize religion for why don’t they write “belief, spiritualism, religion”, and to include identity, and expression.

        They should just write “sex stuff”, and everyone is happy.

  • Ledericas@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    13 hours ago

    youtube has enshittified for a while, they went downhill as soon as they announced that they no longer backed election denial reports. then all the right wing, anti-woke videos started popping up all over the place, plus the one that try to seem like its both sides videos too.

    allowing people like beast, and others to dominate the front, was asking for trouble.

  • qaz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    13 hours ago

    Everyone should check out PeerTube sometime, the UX has improved a lot and there’s a decent amount of content too. I recommend installing the PeerTube Companion app. It shows a popup on YouTube if you’ve clicked on a video that is also available on PeerTube.

    • VerticaGG@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      4 minutes ago

      Nebula.tv

      and

      Means.tv

      both offer more curated platforms that arent owned and operated by the broligarchy

      I realize Peertube is free and Floss but it’s esoteric and lacking buy in; like a great open source console with no games. (Whats more if you dont use a VPN it can be used to track your view history, iirc)

      I’m broke af but planning on getting subscriptions to both asap; real shit bc if the monetization model is “free” (ads) then you the viewer are the product, units for their ecomomy.

      and they’ll canibalize you when their done with queer people, brown people and other marginalized folks like me.

  • spicehoarder@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    15 hours ago

    I hated Google far before it was cool. I would feel vindicated if it weren’t so damn overdue. They don’t even contribute meaningfully to society. And I mean that about EVERYTHING

    Gmail is lame, their search engine sucks, chrome wastes resources, their ads platform ruined the internet, Golang fundamentally sucks, the emulation layer of android is so fucking wasteful, Material Design ruined digital creativity, etc.

    • RobotsLeftHand@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Google search feels like it has stopped being the magic it was. Now whenever I search for something I might not find it underneath all the stuff on sale. For the first time in I don’t know how many years I’ve been finding myself using something else like Duck Duck Go.

      • AnjunaSouls@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 hour ago

        Yep, that’s intentional. They stopped prioritizing user experience and started prioritizing ad revenue instead a while ago

        • 13igTyme@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          13 hours ago

          I used to use Google shopping to find certain items and compare websites. Now the entire left side that used to be a filter list is replaced. When you click a “filter” option it just adds text to the search bar. Then it will include an essay about why these are your options for something and recommend top brands, but then just list everything.