In a nutshell: As Microsoft prepares to end free security updates for Windows 10 in October, a significant challenge looms for charities that refurbish and distribute older computers to those in need. With an estimated 240 million PCs unable to meet the stringent hardware requirements for Windows 11, these organizations face a difficult decision: provide potentially insecure Windows 10 systems, send them to e-waste recyclers, or explore alternative operating systems like Linux.

Microsoft’s requirements for Windows 11 include a 1GHz or faster CPU with at least two cores, 4GB of RAM, 64GB of storage, Secure Boot capability, and TPM 2.0 compatibility. However, the supported Intel CPU list only goes back to 8th Gen chips, introduced in 2017, while the AMD list includes Ryzen 2000 series and above.

  • orclev@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Microsoft’s requirements for Windows 11 include a 1GHz or faster CPU with at least two cores, 4GB of RAM, 64GB of storage,

    All of this is no problem and essentially any computer manufactured in the last couple decades can meet these requirements. They’re effectively irrelevant for this discussion.

    Secure Boot capability, and TPM 2.0 compatibility.

    This is the problem right here. Pretty much every last computer you hear about that isn’t compatible it’s one or both of these, almost always the TPM 2.0 module.

    That of course is if the reason you aren’t “upgrading” is because the hardware isn’t supported. For a great many of us our hardware is supported, we just don’t want all the bullshit anti-features Microsoft has crammed into Windows 11. Windows 10 was already bad enough with it’s constant telemetry spyware, that annoying Cortana garbage shoehorned in anywhere they could manage, the absolute atrocity that they turned the start menu search function into, and the annoying Teams and OneDrive integrations that randomly reinstalled and re-enabled themselves after updates.

    Then MS went and had to cram in even more spyware by way of their horrible copilot garbage. All for what? What are we getting with 11 that’s better than 10? What feature justifies that upgrade? Nothing, that’s the answer. There’s no reason at all that 11 needed to be made.

  • SayCyberOnceMore@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 day ago

    IMHO each new version of Windows looks & feels different to the last anyway, so most (general users) wouldn’t know the difference - they just need a web browser an email client and an office suite.

    That 1 Windows-only program they use is probably not compatible with the next version of Windows too

    • shortrounddev@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      16 hours ago

      That 1 Windows-only program they use is probably not compatible with the next version of Windows too

      No it probably is, Microsoft puts a ton of effort into backwards compatibility

    • BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      My 10yo netbook runs the latest Debian Linux. If it was running on its original OS (XP) it would not only crawl but be dangerously vulnerable.

      • franticdisembowel@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        23 hours ago

        Wow, pretty unbelievable a netbook was still being sold with XP in 2015 lol. How’d you come about getting that?

  • DigDoug@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    If you’re buying a PC that doesn’t have the specs to run Windows 11, you’re probably only using it for web browsing tasks anyway. I’d wager that many of them wouldn’t even notice that they’re using a different OS.

    • Altima NEO@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      My old PC has the horsepower to run 11. I even forced it on there. I got a tpm module too. But the cpu itself isn’t officially supported, even though it’s a i7 5930K with 6 cores and 12 threads @4 GHz.

    • Fondots@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      My PC isn’t compatible with Windows 11.

      I cobbled it together from spare parts as my wife has upgraded over the years. It was a pretty beefy computer when she first built it, and it’s gotten a couple upgrades along the way, but the CPU and MoBo are probably about 10 years old if not older (it’s an AMD FX-something, I’m unsure of the exact specs, it’s whatever parts were in her bin of cast-offs stuck with a new case and hard drive)

      And I’m happily gaming on it. I may not be maxing out the latest AAA titles in glorious 8k epic quality 120hz HDR VR yadda yadda yadda, but I can still run pretty much any game out there on some acceptable mid-to-high quality settings and decent performance.

      I’m probably going to have to either upgrade the MoBo and processor come October, or make the jump to Linux (which I’m not exactly opposed to, but I do like not having to fuck with wine and proton to run my games)

      It’s a perfectly serviceable board, still doing just fine by me, and there’s no reason it can’t give someone at least a few more good years of use, even as a gaming computer if you’re not a graphics snob.

      But if I decide to upgrade, unless I find someone who wants to run Linux on it, or understands the risk of running win10 with no security updates, it’s probably going to become e waste.

        • Fondots@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 day ago

          Yeah, steam has definitely done a lot to improve the situation and I’m very impressed with the current state of things.

          I just have a bit of a mental block from the last time I seriously tried to use Linux (circa 2009 probably) that I need to get over. A lot has changed since then

    • The Octonaut@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 day ago

      Well, because if the receiver of these can’t or won’t use Linux, then not efficiently trying to recycle them will either put the burden of getting them properly recycled on vulnerable people, or they just won’t be, either sitting collecting dust or being thrown in the dump.

      I’m not saying it’s a strong reason, but it is a question to consider.

      • daggermoon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 day ago

        Most people have limited experience with computers. Most of them have barely used Windows so I don’t see Linux Mint as being any more difficult for those folks.

        • The Octonaut@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 day ago

          Even taking that incredibly Lemmy-brained statement as fact, I wonder if you understand that donated computers are not primarily for people who don’t ordinarily have a reason to use computers.

    • WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      21 hours ago

      username checks out. I’m not even joking. no web browser has had XP support for years by now, even firefox dropped it for 7 I think last year

      • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 day ago

        No no, that’s the point. To infect as many computers as absolutely possible, all clogging down every network, and eventually microsoft will have to address the issues.

        What do you care? I assume you’re on linux and wouldn’t be affected either way.

        • regrub@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 day ago

          You seem to have a lot more faith in microsoft than I do.

          My concern is the likelyhood that companies using MS products will cut corners by using deprecated/unsupported OSs for years after the last security patch, which will lead to security breaches for many consumers.

          Not on Linux yet, but I really need to make the switch soon. Will be nice to actually have some semblance of control over my own personal devices.

          • 0x0@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            21 hours ago

            My concern is the likelyhood that companies using MS products will cut corners by using deprecated/unsupported OSs for years after the last security patch, which will lead to security breaches for many consumers.

            That likelihood is high, real and current.