• over_clox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      14 days ago

      It’s only old if you’ve seen it before. The movie could be 100+ years old, but if you’ve never seen it before, it’s still totally new to you.

      • rumschlumpel@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        14 days ago

        ‘old’ and ‘unknown to me’ aren’t the same thing and never were. When someone says they’re into ‘old movies’, they never mean that they like rewatching movies from the 2020s.

        • over_clox@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          14 days ago

          Then please define exactly what NOS means?

          New Old Stock. Yes, NOS is a thing, literally old stuff still in the original box, unopened, never used.

          Shit, you got any idea how much money Biff got for his OG unopened box set copy of Back To The Future?

          https://youtube.com/watch?v=dsIcCtylbUw

          Just because a thing was made ages ago doesn’t necessarily mean it’s ever even been used/viewed/played or whatever.

          And Biff wasn’t stupid, he learned from the very movie he played in.

          • rumschlumpel@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            edit-2
            14 days ago

            That’s just not what “old” or “new” mean for media. You could maybe make that argument if the movie was made a long time ago but only released now, but that’s a very rare case. The public has already consumed the media, if it was somewhat popular you might be aware of what people thought about it before you even watch it for the first time, and if it was influential it might even interact with younger movies, possibly leading to you thinking that certain elements of it are overdone or old hat when this might actually have been one of the first works to have used these elements.

            On top of that, the general societal context is not that of today, but of when the movie was made - few works are so timeless that this doesn’t matter at all.

            • over_clox@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              13 days ago

              Try watching Pink Flamingos

              If you’ve anything like the audience of the time it came out, you’ll almost certainly turn it off within about 10 to 15 minutes.

              But it’ll likely be new to you.

              Highly not recommended…

      • Crazyslinkz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        13 days ago

        I’m watching the original “twilight zone” made in the 60s. This is an old show, that is new to me.

        It’s not a new show to everyone. It’s an old show that was made and released many years ago.

  • Deestan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    13 days ago

    Absolutely. It’s from the time when families used to share a single phone! That they glued to the wall!!

    • XeroxCool@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      13 days ago

      Meanwhile in 2025, I’m deciding if I need to wall mount my bidet remote for “anti theft” purposes

  • jordanlund@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    13 days ago

    As much as I hate to admit it, yes. That’s 30 years ago now.

    Think of it like this… If Back to the Future came out today, they would be going back to 1995.

    🤯

    Movies from 1955 were old in 1985, so movies from 1995 are old now.

  • Chainweasel@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    13 days ago

    1995 was 30 years ago.
    In 1995, 30 year old movies would have been made in 1965, and in the 90s we would have absolutely considered movies made in the 60s to be “old”.
    So, I’d say yes, movies made in 1995 could be considered old.

    • exasperation@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      13 days ago

      The plot of Austin Powers revolves around thawing a man who has been frozen for 30 years, from 1967 to 1997. Only 2 years to go before we reach 30 years from that movie’s release.

      • Kraven_the_Hunter@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        13 days ago

        And you just know that Hollywood is waiting for that one guy to die so that they can reboot this. Instead of just making an original nostalgia-driven time traveling movie.

  • Fondots@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    13 days ago

    I think it depends on the movie

    If, after 30 years it still has a lot of cultural relevance, I’d think of it as a “classic” movie.

    If it doesn’t, if it hasn’t aged well and/or faded into obscurity, I think it’s fair to think of it as an old movie.

    Probably around '95, I would have been watching Star Wars for the first time. It didn’t feel like an old movie to me then and it still doesn’t to this day. Other movies from that same era haven’t aged quite as well and felt “old” to me.

    Looking at some of the top movies from '95, some of them are just as enjoyable or relevant today as they were when they released, others feel dated and not relevant to me today.

    It’s going to depend on your personal tastes and experiences of course. I can also sprinkle in a lot of platitudes like “you’re only as old as you feel” and “one man’s trash is another man’s treasure”

    I think there’s also room for some overlap. There’s classic movies that also feel dated. I think some movies can be both old and classics. You’d be pretty hard-pressed to find someone who wouldn’t agree that, for example, Casablanca, isn’t old, but I think that just about everyone agrees that it’s also a classic. Where the line is is pretty murky.

  • Acamon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    13 days ago

    Based on when I was young, I basically thought of anything from before I was born as “old”. Not consciously, just that everything from “my” decade seemed modern, and everything else was old.

    Even now, movies from 20+ years ago look old, even though I remember them being super new when they came out. The Matrix had aged pretty well, but it defintely looks old. I thought LOTR was timeless, but I rewatched it recently and did start to feel it was showing it’s age (but none the worse for it!).

  • Dasus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    13 days ago

    Yes.

    And I was old enough to remember going to the movies in 1995.

    Not by myself, but dad took us to see some.