• Dasus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      They’re on a carriage that’s like pontooned at the bottom, being pulled by the horse and driver who each have their own balloons.

      edit oh wait d’you mean the ones in the back right my bad dk about them

      • MeekerThanBeaker@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        2 days ago

        Back right?

        I see two in the back left and two more in the back middle without balloons. The two in the back right are the carriage passengers.

    • dual_sport_dork 🐧🗡️@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      90
      ·
      3 days ago

      Absolutely, but the scale of the balloons is a bit off. Nobody would be walking shoulder to shoulder like this. For a normal-ish 170lb/77kg individual your personal balloon would have to be a little under 6.5 meters across assuming it were filled with helium.

      Yes, I did the math.

      • surewhynotlem@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        33
        ·
        3 days ago

        You did the basic math, with your spherical balloon. What about giant cylinders? Then you could really pack it in.

        • dual_sport_dork 🐧🗡️@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          42
          ·
          3 days ago

          Sure. You could do a cylinder of three quarters of a meter across which seems like a reasonable footprint for someone to stand in. That’d only have to be, uh, 325.5 meters tall to have the same volume.

            • ReanuKeeves@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              15
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              3 days ago

              Your asshole “buddy” constantly throwing sharp objects at your balloon causing you to be wet all the time and laughing as you ask your mom if she can mend your massive cylinder for the 13th time this month

      • tyler@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        3 days ago

        You could use hydrogen, which is less dense than helium. Then if it catches on fire like the Hindenburg you’d already be in the water.

        • perestroika@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          It wouldn’t help. The thing that gives you lift is the mass of displaced air. Difference from the (lack of) mass of the lifting gas is minimal.

          • tyler@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            11 hours ago

            It would, but less than the density difference, since you’ve removed weight from the balloon thus gravity has less of a pull on the balloon. My wife (a PE in thermodynamics) was the one that verified that comment before I posted it, hence why I didn’t say it would increase lift by the difference in density.

      • Neverclear@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        3 days ago

        Note that you wouldn’t need 77 kg worth of bouyancy from the balloon. The shoes would provide some lift, more if you made them out of some type of foam.

      • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        Hope that lake doesn’t have any breezes or gusts.

        … Also, assuming you just did the calc for neutralizing the weight of said person…

        Even if there was no wind… they could not walk.

        Walking requires weight to work.

        A surface you can push off of.

        It seems like the picture shows one guy with walking sticks, which I guess might kinda work if the lake is less than about 2 or 3 feet, or under a meter deep… not too many lakes like that.

        Maybe something like stilts… or … huge snowshoe/flipper type things… might work?

  • rational_lib@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Now I’m wondering why we don’t attach giant balloons to ships to reduce water resistance by cutting down how much of the ship needs to be underwater. Perhaps it’s because you would need more size for the balloon, and maybe the air resistance and water resistance needs to even out due to physical laws that I’m too lazy to think about?

    • IndustryStandard@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      The boat already floats. What is the point of making it lighter? Boats are handy for transporting extreme weights because water weighs more than air.

      If it should fly then get a Zepplin

    • AdrianTheFrog@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      Any amount of water contact introduces a fair amount of drag. There may be an ideal point somewhere in the middle, but I think if you take this to it’s natural conclusion you get a zeppelin.

      I did a little bit of math and I think that to lift the payload capacity (including fuel and crew) of a modern day Panama canal ship you would need about a tenth of the peak U.S. helium reserve (a cube about half a kilometer long on each edge, about 1.3x longer than the long dimension of the ship)

      I don’t think you’d get the best fuel efficiency going upwind lol

      Anything smaller would come with proportionally less downsides and at least proportionally less benefits. I doubt it could ever be a net positive in any useful metric.

  • YoiksAndAway@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    3 days ago

    There are two people water-walking without balloons behind the two women on the left. Time travelers? Aliens? The JFK assassins? We deserve the truth!

  • nectar45@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    3 days ago

    I actually went to that timeline! And its more complex than you think because well yes, there technology is far cooler and more whimsical, abd yes there world is more socialistic, has more free time, better prices and less of a late stage capitalism nightmare…

    But you should just see how many racial slurs those people used just this morning and half of those women cant vote and have polio.

    Also I am pretty sure left-handed people got hunted to extinction for some reason

    Timeline hopping is a mixed bag

      • nectar45@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        Well I went to a timeline where Reddit managed to organize a nuclear attack against Russia and it backfired HARD, a timeline where we never moved on from the 90s which sounds awesome and it was but the uncriticized ultra-consumption of those times eventually laid waste to the world, a world where JK Rowling succeded at making TERFs the mainstream feminism wave, a timeline where X is the ONLY major website left in the world and its as awful as it sounds, a timeline where being a CIS man was illegal, a timeline where Musk is president, a timeline where pernanently horny sentient sex-robots rule over humanity and a timeline where the soviet union defeated the United States during the cold war so “President” Putin is the most powerful man in the world.

        So yeah…I think there is a problem with my dimensional hopper, it only sends me to “dark” timelines